SZCXK v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 1019
The proposed new ground had little or no prospect of success because the appellant did not expressly make, and the material before the Tribunal did not clearly raise, a claim that his objection to the hooligans' criminal activities amounted to political opinion or that any harm was for that reason. There was nothing connecting the hooligans' conduct with government, imputing political opinion to the appellant, or showing motivation based on political opinion. In any event, the Tribunal found no past persecution and no real chance of future treatment amounting to persecution. Leave to amend was therefore refused and the appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Migration; Protection Visa; Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia and Application for Leave to File an Amended Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to file an amended Notice of Appeal dismissed; appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution' 'political Opinion' 'refugee Review Tribunal Review Obligation' 'leave to Amend Notice of Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration; Protection Visa; Judicial Review Appeal / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia and Application for Leave to File an Amended Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appellant should be granted leave to file an amended Notice of Appeal raising a new ground not relied upon before the Federal Magistrate.' "Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred by failing to consider whether harm feared from local hooligans because of the appellant's objection to illegal activities could be persecution for reasons of political opinion." 'Whether the material before the Tribunal articulated or clearly raised a claim to persecution based on political opinion.' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to consider whether the appellant had a well-founded fear of persecution on return to Bangladesh.']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed new ground had little or no prospect of success because the appellant did not expressly make, and the material before the Tribunal did not clearly raise, a claim that his objection to the hooligans' criminal activities amounted to political opinion or that any harm was for that reason. There was nothing connecting the hooligans' conduct with government, imputing political opinion to the appellant, or showing motivation based on political opinion. In any event, the Tribunal found no past persecution and no real chance of future treatment amounting to persecution. Leave to amend was therefore refused and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to file an amended Notice of Appeal dismissed; appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to file an amended Notice of Appeal is dismissed.' 'The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment