SZDCT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 992

SZDCT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 992

Leave to appeal was refused because the Federal Magistrate was correct to dismiss the application as out of time and as an attempt to re-litigate matters already heard and decided. No arguable case or injustice was shown, the proceedings were an abuse of process, and the attempt to challenge the delegate's decision was plainly incompetent.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 July 2006
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal in a Migration Matter / On Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia; Application for Leave to Appeal Dismissed
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs; filing restriction imposed without leave of a Judge.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'time Limits Under S 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)' 'relocation Principle' 'abuse of Process' 'leave to Appeal']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'federal Civil Procedure'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'time Limits Under S 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)' 'relocation Principle' 'abuse of Process' 'leave to Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal in a Migration Matter / On Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia; Application for Leave to Appeal Dismissed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court decision dismissing the application as out of time under s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' "Whether the applicant could re-litigate challenges to the Refugee Review Tribunal's relocation finding after earlier proceedings had finally determined the issue." "Whether the applicant could challenge the delegate's decision after review by the Refugee Review Tribunal."]

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the Federal Magistrate was correct to dismiss the application as out of time and as an attempt to re-litigate matters already heard and decided. No arguable case or injustice was shown, the proceedings were an abuse of process, and the attempt to challenge the delegate's decision was plainly incompetent.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs; filing restriction imposed without leave of a Judge.

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed with costs.' 'Costs be fixed in the sum of $1,200.' 'The applicant not file any further proceeding in this Court seeking to challenge the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal made on 3 February 2004 and handed down on 25 February 2004 or the decision of the...