SZDCV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 462
The Tribunal's decision was not affected by jurisdictional error; it was entitled to make findings not accepting the appellant’s claims, and the primary judge correctly dismissed the judicial review application as there was no jurisdictional error established.
- Parties
- Appellant: SZDCV; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Protection Visa, Jurisdictional Error, Significant Harm
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZDCV
Appellant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal's decision to affirm refusal of a protection visa involved jurisdictional error
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant evidence or misconstrued the appellant's claims
- 3 Whether the appellant established a real risk of significant harm if returned to Indonesia
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision was not affected by jurisdictional error; it was entitled to make findings not accepting the appellant’s claims, and the primary judge correctly dismissed the judicial review application as there was no jurisdictional error established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The appellant pay the first respondent's costs as taxed or agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment