SZDMD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 126
As there was no realistic prospect of success on appeal from the Federal Magistrate's dismissal by reason of the applicant's non-attendance, it would be futile to grant an extension of time; therefore, the application is dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'non Attendance' 'exercise of Discretion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Federal Magistrate Scarlett wrongly exercised discretion in dismissing proceedings due to applicant's non-attendance" 'Whether there is a realistic prospect of success for an appeal against dismissal for non-attendance']
Ratio Decidendi
As there was no realistic prospect of success on appeal from the Federal Magistrate's dismissal by reason of the applicant's non-attendance, it would be futile to grant an extension of time; therefore, the application is dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment