SZDNL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 170
There is no satisfactory explanation for the almost three-year delay, and the proposed appeal lacks merit; therefore, there are no 'special reasons' to justify granting leave to file and serve a Notice of Appeal out of time.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZDNL; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Notice of Appeal / Decision on Extension of Time Application
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Judicial Review, Natural Justice, Leave to Appeal, Refugee Status Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZDNL
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve Notice of Appeal / Decision on Extension of Time Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are 'special reasons' to grant an extension of time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal
- 2 Whether the delay in applying for an extension is satisfactorily explained
- 3 Whether the proposed appeal has merit
Ratio Decidendi
There is no satisfactory explanation for the almost three-year delay, and the proposed appeal lacks merit; therefore, there are no 'special reasons' to justify granting leave to file and serve a Notice of Appeal out of time.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed
Orders
- The name of the first respondent be amended to read 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship'.
- The application for extension of time within which to file and serve a Notice of Appeal be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment