SZDQF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1728

SZDQF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1728

The applicant did not explain the delay in filing the application for leave to appeal and did not demonstrate special reasons for an extension of time. More importantly, he identified no particularised jurisdictional error, error of law, or arguable error by the Federal Magistrate, and the RRT decision turned on credibility findings. Because the proposed appeal had no apparent prospects of success and the Federal Magistrate's decision was not attended by doubt, there was no purpose in extending time or granting leave.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time From Federal Magistrates Court Judicial Review Decision / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time in the Federal Court of Australia
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal refused; application for extension of time dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'credibility Findings']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'credibility Findings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time From Federal Magistrates Court Judicial Review Decision / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time in the Federal Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether special reasons existed to extend time to seek leave to appeal against the Federal Magistrate's decision." 'Whether the proposed appeal had any prima facie prospects of success.' "Whether the Federal Magistrate erred in upholding the respondent's notice of objection to competency and dismissing the judicial review application as incompetent." "Whether any jurisdictional error or error of law was identified in the RRT's decision."]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not explain the delay in filing the application for leave to appeal and did not demonstrate special reasons for an extension of time. More importantly, he identified no particularised jurisdictional error, error of law, or arguable error by the Federal Magistrate, and the RRT decision turned on credibility findings. Because the proposed appeal had no apparent prospects of success and the Federal Magistrate's decision was not attended by doubt, there was no purpose in extending time or granting leave.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused; application for extension of time dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the respondent's costs.

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to appeal is refused.' 'The applicant to pay the costs of the application.']