SZDUA v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship and Refugee Review Tribunal [2008] FCA 83
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because it was filed approximately five days out of time and the applicant's explanations did not justify an extension of time; in any event, there was no material before the Court that would allow interference with Turner FM's discretionary decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Federal Court Hearing of Application for Leave to Appeal From Turner Fm's Decision Dismissing a Notice of Motion to Vacate Orders and Reinstate the Matter
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'extension of Time' 'discretionary Decision' 'non Attendance at Hearing' 'refugee Review Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Federal Court Hearing of Application for Leave to Appeal From Turner Fm's Decision Dismissing a Notice of Motion to Vacate Orders and Reinstate the Matter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file the application for leave to appeal filed approximately five days out of time.' "Whether leave to appeal should be granted from Turner FM's discretionary decision dismissing the applicant's notice of motion to vacate earlier orders and reinstate the matter."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because it was filed approximately five days out of time and the applicant's explanations did not justify an extension of time; in any event, there was no material before the Court that would allow interference with Turner FM's discretionary decision.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ["The applicant's application for leave to appeal filed 3 December 2007 is dismissed." "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1000.00."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment