SZDUE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 898
The applicant has established special reasons warranting an extension of time to appeal due to non-availability of written reasons within the statutory timeframe, and the proposed appeal has prospects of success in light of subsequent High Court authority.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Decision on Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Extension of time to file and serve notice of appeal granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'leave to Appeal']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Decision on Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether special reasons exist to justify extension of time to file and serve notice of appeal' 'Whether the decision of the Federal Magistrates Court is affected by jurisdictional error in light of subsequent High Court authority' 'Whether written reasons were available within statutory timeframe']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant has established special reasons warranting an extension of time to appeal due to non-availability of written reasons within the statutory timeframe, and the proposed appeal has prospects of success in light of subsequent High Court authority.
Court Disposition
Extension of time to file and serve notice of appeal granted.
Orders
- ['The applicant have leave to file and serve a notice of appeal from the judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court pronounced on 5 April 2005 within 21 days from the date of this order.' 'The costs of this application be costs in the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment