SZDWG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1339

SZDWG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1339

The Tribunal did not commit jurisdictional error; it did not require corroboration as a matter of law, made reasonable findings on imputed political opinion and credibility, and addressed the question of state protection based on available evidence and country information. The grounds of appeal thus lacked merit.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 September 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing of Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Assessment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment After Hearing of Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court

  1. 1 ["Whether Tribunal erred in requiring corroboration of appellants' evidence" 'Whether Tribunal erred in rejecting imputed political opinion without further inquiry' 'Whether Tribunal failed to address state protection']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not commit jurisdictional error; it did not require corroboration as a matter of law, made reasonable findings on imputed political opinion and credibility, and addressed the question of state protection based on available evidence and country information. The grounds of appeal thus lacked merit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent, the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs.']