SZEAN v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 526
Because the application to the Tribunal for review of the Minister's decision was made outside statutory time limits, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction. The failure to comply with the mandatory 28-day period was not excused by the applicant's reliance on the migration agent, and no jurisdictional error was disclosed. Leave to appeal and an extension of time would be futile.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Application to Extend Time and for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal and to extend time dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'mandatory Time Limits' 'application for Judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Application to Extend Time and for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to review the Minister's decision where the application was lodged out of time" 'Whether leave to appeal and an extension of time should be granted to the applicant']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the application to the Tribunal for review of the Minister's decision was made outside statutory time limits, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction. The failure to comply with the mandatory 28-day period was not excused by the applicant's reliance on the migration agent, and no jurisdictional error was disclosed. Leave to appeal and an extension of time would be futile.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal and to extend time dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal against a decision of the Federal Magistrates Court and to extend time for filing that application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment