SZEEZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1916

SZEEZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1916

The grounds of appeal have not been established. There was no failure to comply with s 424A of the Migration Act 1958, nor was there a denial of natural justice or jurisdictional error by the Tribunal or error by the Federal Magistrates Court.

Parties
Appellant: SZEEZ; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Decision of Federal Magistrates Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Protection Visa, Judicial Review, Jurisdictional Error, Natural Justice, Application of S 424 a Migration Act 1958
Migration Law Protection Visa Judicial Review Jurisdictional Error Natural Justice Application of S 424 a Migration Act 1958

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZEEZ

Appellant

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

First Respondent

Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Decision of Federal Magistrates Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal committed jurisdictional error by not complying with s 424A of the Migration Act 1958
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal denied natural justice to the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The grounds of appeal have not been established. There was no failure to comply with s 424A of the Migration Act 1958, nor was there a denial of natural justice or jurisdictional error by the Tribunal or error by the Federal Magistrates Court.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal be dismissed.
  • The appellant pay the first respondent's costs in the sum of $2,600.