SZERI v MIMA & Anor [2006] FCA 1605
Because the Appellant had left Australia, did not appear, and was not in a position to prosecute the appeal, the Court dismissed the appeal under s 25 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 and, accepting the First Respondent's estimate of party and party costs as reasonable, fixed costs at $1,600.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'dismissal of Appeal' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should be dismissed where the Appellant had left Australia, did not appear, and was not in a position to prosecute the appeal.' 'Whether costs should be fixed in the amount sought by the First Respondent.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Appellant had left Australia, did not appear, and was not in a position to prosecute the appeal, the Court dismissed the appeal under s 25 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 and, accepting the First Respondent's estimate of party and party costs as reasonable, fixed costs at $1,600.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The Applicant is to pay the costs of the First Respondent of and incidental to the appeal fixed in an amount of $1,600.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment