SZERI v MIMA & Anor [2006] FCA 1605

SZERI v MIMA & Anor [2006] FCA 1605

Because the Appellant had left Australia, did not appear, and was not in a position to prosecute the appeal, the Court dismissed the appeal under s 25 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 and, accepting the First Respondent's estimate of party and party costs as reasonable, fixed costs at $1,600.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'dismissal of Appeal' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa / Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the appeal should be dismissed where the Appellant had left Australia, did not appear, and was not in a position to prosecute the appeal.' 'Whether costs should be fixed in the amount sought by the First Respondent.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the Appellant had left Australia, did not appear, and was not in a position to prosecute the appeal, the Court dismissed the appeal under s 25 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 and, accepting the First Respondent's estimate of party and party costs as reasonable, fixed costs at $1,600.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The Applicant is to pay the costs of the First Respondent of and incidental to the appeal fixed in an amount of $1,600.']