SZEUB v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 330
The Federal Magistrates Court lacked jurisdiction to review a primary decision under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth); the purported application for review was incompetent, and there were no prospects of success on appeal—leave to appeal was refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['jurisdiction of Federal Magistrates Court' 'protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'interlocutory Decisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Magistrates Court had jurisdiction to review a primary decision under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted against dismissal of proceedings as interlocutory under rule 44.12']
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Magistrates Court lacked jurisdiction to review a primary decision under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth); the purported application for review was incompetent, and there were no prospects of success on appeal—leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Leave is given to amend the title of the proceedings to refer to the first respondent as the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship' 'The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment