SZEXZ v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 449
A breach of s 424B(2) by granting more time than the prescribed period to provide additional information, without prejudice to the applicant who responded within time and attended a hearing, does not amount to jurisdictional error and does not invalidate the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['procedure Under Migration Act 1958' 'jurisdictional Error' 'time Limits for Provision of Information' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a breach of s 424B(2) (prescribing time period for giving additional information) constitutes jurisdictional error by the Refugee Review Tribunal']
Ratio Decidendi
A breach of s 424B(2) by granting more time than the prescribed period to provide additional information, without prejudice to the applicant who responded within time and attended a hearing, does not amount to jurisdictional error and does not invalidate the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment