SZEZG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 2003

There was no arguable case that the Tribunal erred in finding it had no jurisdiction, and accordingly, any appeal would fail. Leave to appeal was dismissed and costs were awarded.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 13 December 2007
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics: ['judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'leave to Appeal']

['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'leave to Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether there was an arguable case that the Tribunal erred in finding it had no jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision refusing a protection visa." 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted.']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no arguable case that the Tribunal erred in finding it had no jurisdiction, and accordingly, any appeal would fail. Leave to appeal was dismissed and costs were awarded.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

Orders

['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the Minister's costs fixed in the sum of $1000."]