SZEZJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 946
The application for enlargement of time was dismissed because the applicant failed to provide any viable grounds of appeal, did not relate the grounds to errors in the judgment appealed from, and did not establish special reasons to depart from the ordinary rule. There were no prospects of the appeal succeeding.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZEZJ; Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Enlargement of Time to Appeal / Determination of Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Procedural Fairness, Jurisdictional Error, Protection Visa, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZEZJ
Applicant
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Enlargement of Time to Appeal / Determination of Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant should be granted enlargement of time to file and serve notice of appeal
- 2 Whether draft notice of appeal discloses viable grounds of review
- 3 Whether there are 'special reasons' to depart from the 21 day time limit
Ratio Decidendi
The application for enlargement of time was dismissed because the applicant failed to provide any viable grounds of appeal, did not relate the grounds to errors in the judgment appealed from, and did not establish special reasons to depart from the ordinary rule. There were no prospects of the appeal succeeding.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application for enlargement of time within which to file and serve a notice of appeal is dismissed.
- Applicant must pay respondent's costs assessed at $500.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment