SZFCX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 890
The applicant did not appear on the first occasion, was given a second opportunity after adjournment and notification directions were complied with, and did not appear at the adjourned hearing; the application was therefore dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application for an Extension of Time Within Which to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal / Hearing of Application in the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'notice of Appeal' 'non Appearance' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for an Extension of Time Within Which to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal / Hearing of Application in the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time within which to file and serve a Notice of Appeal from the judgment of Scarlett FM delivered on 13 April 2005.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not appear on the first occasion, was given a second opportunity after adjournment and notification directions were complied with, and did not appear at the adjourned hearing; the application was therefore dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time within which to file and serve a Notice of Appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment