SZFIR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 885
The application for leave to appeal is itself an abuse of process, as it lacks merit and merely seeks to re-agitate matters already determined adversely to the applicant in previous litigation; consequently, there is no prospect of success, and leave to appeal should be refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZFIR; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Constitutional Writ Relief, Protection Visa, Vexatious Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZFIR
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrates Court decision dismissing the applicant's second application for constitutional writ relief as incompetent and an abuse of process
- 2 Whether the applicant's repeated applications constitute an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal is itself an abuse of process, as it lacks merit and merely seeks to re-agitate matters already determined adversely to the applicant in previous litigation; consequently, there is no prospect of success, and leave to appeal should be refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment