SZFSV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1860
The importance and unsettled nature of the issue whether s 425 requires a new Tribunal hearing after remittal justifies referral of the appeal to a Full Court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Adjournment to Full Court
- Outcome
- Hearing adjourned; appellate jurisdiction to be exercised by a Full Court; no order as to costs of adjournment.
- Legal Topics
- ['s 425 Migration Act' 'appellate Jurisdiction' 'requirement to Provide Hearing on Remittal' 'referral to Full Court' 'costs of Adjournment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Adjournment to Full Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 425 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) requires the newly constituted Tribunal to provide the applicant a hearing after remittal' 'Appropriateness of referral to the Full Court given conflicting authorities']
Ratio Decidendi
The importance and unsettled nature of the issue whether s 425 requires a new Tribunal hearing after remittal justifies referral of the appeal to a Full Court.
Court Disposition
Hearing adjourned; appellate jurisdiction to be exercised by a Full Court; no order as to costs of adjournment.
Orders
- ['The hearing of the appeal be adjourned to a date to be fixed in the Full Court sittings of the Court in February 2008.' 'The appellate jurisdiction of the Court in relation to the appeal be exercised by a Full Court.' 'There be no order as to the costs of the adjournment.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment