SZFUO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 746

SZFUO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 746

The appeal was dismissed pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) as the appellants failed to attend the hearing.

Parties
Appellant: SZFUO; Appellant: SZFUP; Appellant: SZFUQ (a minor by her next friend SZFUO); Appellant: SZFUR (a minor by his next friend SZFUO); Appellant: SZFUS (a minor by his next friend SZFUO); Appellant: SZFUT (a minor by her next friend SZFUO); First Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal for Failure to Appear
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Non Appearance, Appeal Procedure
Administrative Law Dismissal for Non Appearance Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZFUO

Appellant

SZFUP

Appellant

SZFUQ (a minor by her next friend SZFUO)

Appellant

SZFUR (a minor by his next friend SZFUO)

Appellant

SZFUS (a minor by his next friend SZFUO)

Appellant

SZFUT (a minor by her next friend SZFUO)

Appellant

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

First Respondent

Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Decision on Appeal for Failure to Appear

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should the appeal be dismissed due to the appellants’ failure to attend the hearing?

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) as the appellants failed to attend the hearing.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for failure of the appellants to attend the hearing of the appeal today.
  • The appellants pay the first respondent's costs in the sum of $3000 in respect of the proceedings.