SZGAD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 979

SZGAD v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 979

Raphael FM's orders were interlocutory and the appellant had filed no application for leave to appeal, so the appeal was incompetent. In any event, the further proceeding was clearly vexatious because it attempted to re-agitate the Tribunal's factual finding that the appellant was not a member of the Freedom Party, and the appeal grounds were completely without substance and doomed to fail.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia in a Migration Judicial Review Proceeding / Federal Court Single Judge Appeal From Interlocutory Summary Dismissal; No Application for Leave to Appeal Filed
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as incompetent; appellant ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'vexatious Proceedings' 'abuse of Process' 'interlocutory Orders' 'leave to Appeal']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'federal Civil Procedure'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'vexatious Proceedings' 'abuse of Process' 'interlocutory Orders' 'leave to Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia in a Migration Judicial Review Proceeding / Federal Court Single Judge Appeal From Interlocutory Summary Dismissal; No Application for Leave to Appeal Filed

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the appeal from Raphael FM's interlocutory orders was competent when no application for leave to appeal had been filed." 'Whether the further Federal Magistrates Court proceeding was vexatious because it sought to impugn the same Refugee Review Tribunal decision and re-agitate factual findings already rejected.' 'Whether the proposed grounds alleging constructive failure of jurisdiction, procedural unfairness and misconception of duty had substance.']

Ratio Decidendi

Raphael FM's orders were interlocutory and the appellant had filed no application for leave to appeal, so the appeal was incompetent. In any event, the further proceeding was clearly vexatious because it attempted to re-agitate the Tribunal's factual finding that the appellant was not a member of the Freedom Party, and the appeal grounds were completely without substance and doomed to fail.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as incompetent; appellant ordered to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed as incompetent.' 'The appellant pay all costs incurred by the respondent in relation to the appeal.']