SZGET v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 1994
After the appeal had been listed for hearing three times and the appellant failed to appear, the Court was satisfied that it was appropriate under s 25 (2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to dismiss the appeal and to order costs against the appellant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Hearing of Appeal; Application to Dismiss for Failure of the Appellant to Attend
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; name of first respondent changed to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.
- Legal Topics
- ['dismissal of Appeal for Non Appearance' 'adjournment' 'costs' 'amendment of Party Name']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Hearing of Appeal; Application to Dismiss for Failure of the Appellant to Attend
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should be dismissed because the appellant failed to attend the hearing.' 'Whether costs should be ordered against the appellant.' "Whether the name of the first respondent should be amended in the Court's record."]
Ratio Decidendi
After the appeal had been listed for hearing three times and the appellant failed to appear, the Court was satisfied that it was appropriate under s 25 (2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) to dismiss the appeal and to order costs against the appellant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; name of first respondent changed to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.
Orders
- ['The name of the first respondent be changed to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.' 'The appeal is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment