SZGHZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1437

SZGHZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1437

The applicant failed to establish any error on the part of the Federal Magistrate in dismissing his application for lack of an arguable case for relief. No jurisdictional error or failure by the Tribunal was demonstrated. The application for leave to appeal must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 August 2007
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Magistrate erred in dismissing the application for lack of an arguable case for relief' "Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant's claims or acted with bias" "Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant's application in accordance with s 91R of the Migration Act 1958"]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to establish any error on the part of the Federal Magistrate in dismissing his application for lack of an arguable case for relief. No jurisdictional error or failure by the Tribunal was demonstrated. The application for leave to appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ["'Refugee Review Tribunal' added as second respondent to the application for leave to appeal filed 12 April 2007." 'The application for leave to appeal filed 12 April 2007 is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the respondent Minister's costs fixed in the sum of $1,400."]