SZGYJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1742
Given the strictures imposed by s477(1A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), the appellant's recognition that his application for constitutional writ relief was out of time, and his request to discontinue the appeal, no useful purpose would be served by allowing the matter to remain in the Court's list; the appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Directions Hearing; Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa Review' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'competency and Time Limits' 'privative Clause Decision' 'discontinuance of Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Directions Hearing; Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should remain in the Federal Court list where the appellant recognised that his Federal Magistrates Court application for constitutional writ relief was out of time and wished to discontinue the appeal.' "Whether s477(1A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) rendered the earlier application incompetent because it was filed more than 28 days after the Tribunal's decision." 'Whether any issue arose under s424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in relation to information about the omission of a subpoena from the protection visa application.']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the strictures imposed by s477(1A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), the appellant's recognition that his application for constitutional writ relief was out of time, and his request to discontinue the appeal, no useful purpose would be served by allowing the matter to remain in the Court's list; the appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'There be no order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment