SZHAK v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1116
The appeal fails because the Tribunal did not breach s 424A or s 91R(3) of the Migration Act. The Tribunal gave the appellant opportunity to present documents. The grounds advanced do not establish jurisdictional error, and the Tribunal's adverse findings on credibility were open to it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Status' 'review Tribunal Procedures' 'section 424 a and 91 R(3) Migration Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to comply with s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the Tribunal breached s 91R(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the Tribunal denied the appellant an opportunity to present documents']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal fails because the Tribunal did not breach s 424A or s 91R(3) of the Migration Act. The Tribunal gave the appellant opportunity to present documents. The grounds advanced do not establish jurisdictional error, and the Tribunal's adverse findings on credibility were open to it.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment