SZHAL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 701

The application for extension of time was dismissed because there was no arguable basis upon which a protection visa could have been allowed and no chance of any appeal succeeding.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 24 May 2006
Procedural Posture: Migration / Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal Against a Decision of the Federal Magistrates Court
Outcome: Application for extension of time dismissed.
Legal Topics: ['extension of Time' 'protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'appeal From Federal Magistrates Court']

['migration'] ['extension of Time' 'protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'appeal From Federal Magistrates Court']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Migration / Application for Extension of Time to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal Against a Decision of the Federal Magistrates Court

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal.' 'Whether there was any available or arguable basis for an appeal against the Federal Magistrates Court decision dismissing review of the Refugee Review Tribunal decision confirming refusal of a protection visa.']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time was dismissed because there was no arguable basis upon which a protection visa could have been allowed and no chance of any appeal succeeding.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed.

Orders

['The application for extension of time be dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent.']