SZHDY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1218
The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal did not commit any jurisdictional error in its reliance on country information, compliance with s 424A was satisfied by a prior letter, and the relocation ground was not material given the findings about the lack of well-founded fear for a Convention reason.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court to Federal Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Status Determination' 'judicial Review' 'country Information' 'section 424 a Notice' 'relocation in Country of Origin']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court to Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred in relying on certain country information' 'Whether the Tribunal breached obligations under Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 424A' "Challenge to Tribunal's findings regarding relocation"]
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal did not commit any jurisdictional error in its reliance on country information, compliance with s 424A was satisfied by a prior letter, and the relocation ground was not material given the findings about the lack of well-founded fear for a Convention reason.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $2,500."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment