SZHFE v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2006] FCA 648

SZHFE v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2006] FCA 648

There was no jurisdictional error; neither section 91R(3) nor section 424A Migration Act were breached. Appellant's conduct in Australia was not relied upon to support his refugee claim; accordingly, section 91R(3) was not enlivened. The RRT's consideration of the applicant's evidence and lack of specificity did not constitute a breach of section 424A. No fairly arguable case for appeal exists, so the notice of motion is dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Notice of Motion to Set Aside Order Dismissing Appeal
Outcome
notice of motion dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['notice of Motion to Set Aside Orders' 'review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'effect of Section 91 R(3) Migration Act' 'procedural Fairness' 'section 424 a Migration Act']
['migration' 'practice and Procedure'] ['notice of Motion to Set Aside Orders' 'review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'effect of Section 91 R(3) Migration Act' 'procedural Fairness' 'section 424 a Migration Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Notice of Motion to Set Aside Order Dismissing Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["whether section 91R(3) Migration Act applies to appellant's conduct in Australia" 'whether section 424A Migration Act was breached' 'whether there is a fairly arguable case for appeal' 'sufficiency of explanation for failure to appear']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no jurisdictional error; neither section 91R(3) nor section 424A Migration Act were breached. Appellant's conduct in Australia was not relied upon to support his refugee claim; accordingly, section 91R(3) was not enlivened. The RRT's consideration of the applicant's evidence and lack of specificity did not constitute a breach of section 424A. No fairly arguable case for appeal exists, so the notice of motion is dismissed.

Court Disposition

notice of motion dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The notice of motion be dismissed with costs.']