SZHFL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 858

SZHFL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 858

The applicant failed to demonstrate any error by the Federal Magistrate in dismissing the application as an abuse of process, and there are no prospects of success on appeal; accordingly, leave to appeal should be dismissed with costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 June 2006
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'abuse of Process' 'protection Visa Refusal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Magistrate erred in dismissing the application as an abuse of process' 'Whether there were prospects for success on appeal against the dismissal of a judicial review application regarding a protection visa refusal']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate any error by the Federal Magistrate in dismissing the application as an abuse of process, and there are no prospects of success on appeal; accordingly, leave to appeal should be dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal be refused.' "The appellant to pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1100.00." 'The RRT be joined as a second respondent in these proceedings.']