SZHKU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1450

The draft notice of appeal did not identify any appealable error, nor present an arguable ground of appeal, making the case hopeless and not appropriate for extension of time to appeal.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 01 November 2006
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: ['extension of Time' 'appeal Grounds' 'judicial Review']

['migration Law'] ['extension of Time' 'appeal Grounds' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the applicants should be granted an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal' 'Whether the draft notice of appeal discloses arguable grounds for appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

The draft notice of appeal did not identify any appealable error, nor present an arguable ground of appeal, making the case hopeless and not appropriate for extension of time to appeal.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

['The application for an extension of time be dismissed.' 'The second applicant pay the costs of the respondent.']