SZHTE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1196
Because the applicant did not appear to prosecute her application for leave to appeal, the Court inferred that she had failed to prosecute the proceedings with due diligence and dismissed the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Federal Court Application Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute
- Outcome
- The application was dismissed and the applicant was ordered to pay the first respondent's costs of the application.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Review Tribunal' 'application for Leave to Appeal' 'failure to Appear' 'failure to Prosecute With Due Diligence' 'dismissal of Application' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Federal Court Application Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application should be dismissed under O 35A r 3 because the applicant failed to appear and failed to prosecute the proceedings with due diligence.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the applicant did not appear to prosecute her application for leave to appeal, the Court inferred that she had failed to prosecute the proceedings with due diligence and dismissed the application.
Court Disposition
The application was dismissed and the applicant was ordered to pay the first respondent's costs of the application.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment