SZHVH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 1079
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as none of the grounds raised by the applicant demonstrated jurisdictional error or denial of procedural fairness by the Tribunal. The allegations were unparticularised and unsupported by material, and the Tribunal's conclusions were open to it on the evidence.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZHVH; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Application for Leave to Appeal, Protection Visa, Jurisdictional Error, Procedural Fairness, Show Cause Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZHVH
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was jurisdictional error by the Tribunal in affirming refusal of Protection (Class XA) Visa
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to afford procedural fairness
- 3 Whether the applicant's fear of persecution was well-founded
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as none of the grounds raised by the applicant demonstrated jurisdictional error or denial of procedural fairness by the Tribunal. The allegations were unparticularised and unsupported by material, and the Tribunal's conclusions were open to it on the evidence.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal filed by applicant SZHVH is dismissed.
- The applicant shall pay the costs of the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment