SZHWW v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 666

SZHWW v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 666

The appellant had in fact claimed to have detailed knowledge of the Shouters in materials submitted to the Tribunal, entitling the Tribunal to question him on these matters; thus, no jurisdictional error occurred and the grounds of appeal were not made out.

Parties
Appellant: SZHWW; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court to Federal Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Protection Visa, Jurisdictional Error, Credibility Assessment, Apprehended Bias
Migration Law Judicial Review Protection Visa Jurisdictional Error Credibility Assessment Apprehended Bias

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZHWW

Appellant

Minister for Immigration & Citizenship

First Respondent

Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court to Federal Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal committed jurisdictional error by misconstruing or misunderstanding the appellant's case.
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal breached section 425 and section 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
  3. 3 Whether there was apprehended bias in the hearing by the Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant had in fact claimed to have detailed knowledge of the Shouters in materials submitted to the Tribunal, entitling the Tribunal to question him on these matters; thus, no jurisdictional error occurred and the grounds of appeal were not made out.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal be dismissed.