SZIBD v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 429
An application for leave to appeal a Federal Magistrate's dismissal of an application due to non-appearance is misconceived and inappropriate where no prior application has been made to set aside the order under rule 16.05(2)(a) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001. Proper procedure dictates that the applicant must first apply to set aside the dismissal for non-attendance, where reasons can be tested by evidence at first instance.
- Parties
- Appellant: SZIBD; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Dismissal for Non Appearance, Procedure for Setting Aside Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZIBD
Appellant
Minister for Immigration & Citizenship
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Court can entertain an appeal from a dismissal for non-appearance without prior application to set aside the dismissal
- 2 Proper procedure for challenging an order dismissing for non-appearance
Ratio Decidendi
An application for leave to appeal a Federal Magistrate's dismissal of an application due to non-appearance is misconceived and inappropriate where no prior application has been made to set aside the order under rule 16.05(2)(a) of the Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001. Proper procedure dictates that the applicant must first apply to set aside the dismissal for non-attendance, where reasons can be tested by evidence at first instance.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1200.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment