SZICV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCAFC 39
Section 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) imposes strict jurisdictional time limits on applications for judicial review in the Federal Magistrates Court. The requirement to make a positive application for extension of time within the specified period is a precondition to the Court's jurisdiction. In the absence of such an application, the Court has no power to entertain the application, regardless of the applicant's substantial compliance or circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'time Limits for Judicial Review' 'extension of Time' 'protection Visas']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the strict time limits in s 477 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) bar the applicant's judicial review;" 'Whether an application for extension of time was made in substance by the applicant for the purposes of s 477(2)(a);' "Whether the Federal Magistrates Court had jurisdiction to hear the applicant's application for judicial review."]
Ratio Decidendi
Section 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) imposes strict jurisdictional time limits on applications for judicial review in the Federal Magistrates Court. The requirement to make a positive application for extension of time within the specified period is a precondition to the Court's jurisdiction. In the absence of such an application, the Court has no power to entertain the application, regardless of the applicant's substantial compliance or circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is granted;' 'The appeal is dismissed;' "The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal;" 'The name of the first respondent is amended to the Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment