SZILR v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 1699
The appeal was dismissed because no error of law, jurisdictional error, or procedural error by the Tribunal or the Federal Magistrate was demonstrated; findings of credibility, fact, and the appellant's lack of well-founded fear were open on the evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['credibility Findings in Refugee Proceedings' 'judicial Review' 'refugee Status Determination' 'bias']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal erred in relying on conflicts in the appellant's evidence to make an adverse credibility finding" "Whether there was jurisdictional or procedural error in the Tribunal's reasoning" 'Whether the Tribunal failed to comply with s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' "Whether there was bias in the Tribunal's conduct"]
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because no error of law, jurisdictional error, or procedural error by the Tribunal or the Federal Magistrate was demonstrated; findings of credibility, fact, and the appellant's lack of well-founded fear were open on the evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment