SZINM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship & Anor [2007] FCA 325
There was no error of law or denial of procedural fairness by the Tribunal or Federal Magistrates Court; grounds based on country information and s 424A must fail, and factual issues cannot be agitated in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Protection' 'procedural Fairness' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there was a jurisdictional error in the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision" 'Whether there was denial of procedural fairness, including compliance with ss 422B and 424A of the Migration Act' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to provide country information covered by s 424A']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error of law or denial of procedural fairness by the Tribunal or Federal Magistrates Court; grounds based on country information and s 424A must fail, and factual issues cannot be agitated in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ["Amend the title of the first respondent to 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship'" 'Appeal dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment