SZIPN v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 293
The applicant failed to establish the requisite doubt or substantial injustice required for leave to appeal; no demonstrated error in the Federal Magistrate’s decision; reinstatement was futile due to absence of reasonable prospects of success.
- Parties
- Appellant: SZIPN; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrate's Interlocutory Decision
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Procedural Fairness, Judicial Review, Costs, Interlocutory Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZIPN
Appellant
Minister for Immigration & Citizenship
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Determination of Leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrate's Interlocutory Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrate's interlocutory decision
- 2 whether the Tribunal denied the applicant procedural fairness
- 3 whether the reinstatement of the judicial review application would be futile due to lack of prospects
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish the requisite doubt or substantial injustice required for leave to appeal; no demonstrated error in the Federal Magistrate’s decision; reinstatement was futile due to absence of reasonable prospects of success.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The title of the first respondent be amended to 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship'.
- The application for leave to appeal from the decision of Federal Magistrate Scarlett of 27 November 2006 is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment