SZIRJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs and Refugee Review Tribunal [2006] FCA 1575
Leave to appeal was refused because the Federal Magistrate's decision was not attended with sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration by the Court; contrary to the applicant's ground, the decision was made after an oral hearing in open Court on 23 May 2006 and reasons were provided.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Judgment of a Federal Magistrate Dismissing an Application Seeking Reinstatement of a Judicial Review Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'federal Magistrates Court Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Judgment of a Federal Magistrate Dismissing an Application Seeking Reinstatement of a Judicial Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrate's judgment." 'Whether the Federal Magistrate made the decision in Chambers and without an oral hearing.' "Whether the Federal Magistrate's decision was attended with sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration by the Federal Court."]
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the Federal Magistrate's decision was not attended with sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration by the Court; contrary to the applicant's ground, the decision was made after an oral hearing in open Court on 23 May 2006 and reasons were provided.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment