SZIVU v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 342
The proposed judicial review application in the Federal Magistrates Court was incompetent because it was very substantially out of time under the applicable migration legislation, and the applicant identified no error in the Federal Magistrate's judgment; leave to appeal was therefore refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Leave to Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Leave to Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to appeal from the Federal Magistrates Court judgment dismissing the application treated as an extension of time to seek judicial review of the Refugee Review Tribunal decision.' 'Whether the proposed application for judicial review was out of time under s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) and Item 42 of Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Migration Litigation Reform Act 2005 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed judicial review application in the Federal Magistrates Court was incompetent because it was very substantially out of time under the applicable migration legislation, and the applicant identified no error in the Federal Magistrate's judgment; leave to appeal was therefore refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The name of the respondent referred to in the application for leave to appeal be amended to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.' 'The Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as the second respondent.' 'The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment