SZJBB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 285

SZJBB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 285

Leave was refused because, although the delay was short and not critical, the proposed appeal had no prospect of success: the Federal Magistrate's judgment was free from doubt, the Tribunal's decision was not attended by jurisdictional error, the applicant had been warned that an adverse decision could be made if he did not attend, and no substantial injustice would arise from refusing leave.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 March 2007
Procedural Posture
Application for an Extension of Time Within Which to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal From a Federal Magistrate's Judgment on Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Leave to Appeal Refused
Outcome
Leave to appeal is refused, with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'falun Gong' 'convention Reason']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'refugee Law'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'falun Gong' 'convention Reason']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for an Extension of Time Within Which to File and Serve a Notice of Appeal From a Federal Magistrate's Judgment on Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Leave to Appeal Refused

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal from the judgment of the Federal Magistrate.' "Whether the proposed appeal had any prospect of success by showing jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision." 'Whether the Tribunal breached s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) or failed to assess the claims according to s 91R of the Act.' 'Whether alleged misleading or wrong advice by a migration agent constituted jurisdictional error.']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave was refused because, although the delay was short and not critical, the proposed appeal had no prospect of success: the Federal Magistrate's judgment was free from doubt, the Tribunal's decision was not attended by jurisdictional error, the applicant had been warned that an adverse decision could be made if he did not attend, and no substantial injustice would arise from refusing leave.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is refused, with costs.

Orders

  • ['The name of the first respondent is amended to read Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.' 'The Refugee Review Tribunal is added as the second respondent.' 'Leave to appeal is refused, with costs.']