SZJGB v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 472

Information in the visa application and oral confirmation/adoption of its contents in the RRT hearing are 'information given for the purpose of the application' within the exception of s 424A(3)(b); there was no breach of s 424A and thus no jurisdictional error.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 03 April 2007
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal (migration/protection Visa) / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics: ['protection Visas' 'procedural Fairness' 'section 424 a Migration Act' 'judicial Review']

['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visas' 'procedural Fairness' 'section 424 a Migration Act' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal (migration/protection Visa) / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal breached s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by failing to provide to the applicant, for comment, his own visa application']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

["The name of the first respondent be amended to read 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship'." 'The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.']