SZJNA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 705
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant identified no error in the Federal Magistrates Court judgment and sought only merits review of the Tribunal's protection visa decision; any appeal would be bound to fail and no utility would attend a grant of leave.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- The application was dismissed and leave to appeal was refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'summary Dismissal' 'leave to Appeal' 'credibility Findings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia Concerning Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrates Court's summary dismissal of the application for judicial review." 'Whether the applicant identified any error in the Federal Magistrates Court judgment rather than seeking merits review of the Tribunal decision.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant identified no error in the Federal Magistrates Court judgment and sought only merits review of the Tribunal's protection visa decision; any appeal would be bound to fail and no utility would attend a grant of leave.
Court Disposition
The application was dismissed and leave to appeal was refused.
Orders
- ['The name of the first respondent be changed to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.' 'The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1 000.00"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment