SZJUK v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 797
The only ground of appeal required evidentiary support, but no evidence going to that ground had been tendered before the Federal Magistrate; the appellant's remaining points invited merits review and did not establish appealable error. The appeal was therefore dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Law Appeal / Appeal From a Judgment of a Federal Magistrate Dismissing an Application to Review a Decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Findings' 'falun Gong' 'appealable Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Law Appeal / Appeal From a Judgment of a Federal Magistrate Dismissing an Application to Review a Decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Federal Magistrate erred in finding that there was no evidence to support the appellant's claim that the second Tribunal said it did not understand why the matter had been remitted after the first Tribunal hearing." "Whether the appellant identified any appealable error in the Federal Magistrate's judgment." "Whether the appellant's other points impermissibly invited merits review rather than identifying jurisdictional error."]
Ratio Decidendi
The only ground of appeal required evidentiary support, but no evidence going to that ground had been tendered before the Federal Magistrate; the appellant's remaining points invited merits review and did not establish appealable error. The appeal was therefore dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed, with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment