SZKFH v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 675
The appellant did not appear at the appeal hearing, and the Court was satisfied that he knew of the hearing fixture. The appeal was therefore dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), with the first respondent's recoverable costs fixed at $1900.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Hearing of Appeal; Appellant Did Not Appear
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Review Tribunal' 'dismissal of Appeal for Non Appearance' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Hearing of Appeal; Appellant Did Not Appear
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should be dismissed when the appellant did not appear at the hearing after being made aware of the hearing fixture.' 'Whether the first respondent should be awarded costs of the appeal fixed in a specified sum.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not appear at the appeal hearing, and the Court was satisfied that he knew of the hearing fixture. The appeal was therefore dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), with the first respondent's recoverable costs fixed at $1900.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal." 'The costs referred to in order 2 be fixed in a sum of $1900.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment