SZKGB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 330

SZKGB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 330

The Tribunal's adverse credibility findings and its determination that the appellant's claims did not warrant protection under the Refugees Convention were open to it. There was no jurisdictional error, nor any procedural fairness breach in relation to ss 424A or 91R of the Migration Act 1958. The appeal must be dismissed as the Tribunal followed lawful procedures and made findings based on evidence.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'procedural Fairness' 'one Child Policy' 'refugees Convention' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal committed jurisdictional error in affirming refusal of protection visa' 'Whether Tribunal complied with procedural fairness obligations under Migration Act 1958, sections 424A and 91R' 'Whether Tribunal made credibility errors or relied on irrelevant/wrong information' 'Whether Tribunal was biased or failed to notify applicant appropriately']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's adverse credibility findings and its determination that the appellant's claims did not warrant protection under the Refugees Convention were open to it. There was no jurisdictional error, nor any procedural fairness breach in relation to ss 424A or 91R of the Migration Act 1958. The appeal must be dismissed as the Tribunal followed lawful procedures and made findings based on evidence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs."]