SZKJS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1820

SZKJS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1820

The applicant failed to appear despite being informed of the hearing, filed no submissions, and the draft notice of appeal alleged only unparticularised errors by the Tribunal rather than any error by the Federal Magistrates Court. The Court found no substance in the application for leave and dismissed it.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal From Orders of the Federal Magistrates Court Summarily Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Hearing of Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs to the first respondent.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'bias' 'section 424 a Notice' 'summary Dismissal' 'leave to Appeal' 'want of Appearance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal From Orders of the Federal Magistrates Court Summarily Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Hearing of Application for Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the application for leave to appeal should be dismissed for want of appearance by the applicant.' 'Whether the proposed appeal identified any error by the Federal Magistrates Court.' 'Whether allegations that the Tribunal was biased, failed to comply with s 424A of the Migration Act 1958, and relied on irrelevant materials disclosed any arguable jurisdictional error.']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to appear despite being informed of the hearing, filed no submissions, and the draft notice of appeal alleged only unparticularised errors by the Tribunal rather than any error by the Federal Magistrates Court. The Court found no substance in the application for leave and dismissed it.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs to the first respondent.

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs."]