SZKMI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1657
There was no jurisdictional error or error in the Federal Magistrate's approach. The Tribunal's findings and procedure were proper, and the applicant failed to demonstrate an arguable ground for appeal or explain the delay. The application for extension of time to appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZKMI; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Decision on Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness, Extension of Time, Protection Visa, Credibility Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZKMI
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Decision on Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal failed to comply with obligations under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
- 2 Whether procedural fairness was denied to the applicant
- 3 Whether the Tribunal breached s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
There was no jurisdictional error or error in the Federal Magistrate's approach. The Tribunal's findings and procedure were proper, and the applicant failed to demonstrate an arguable ground for appeal or explain the delay. The application for extension of time to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application for an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment