SZKMQ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCA 1326
The appellant did not appear when the appeal was called, and the Minister's movement records indicated that he had departed Australia on 9 September 2009 while holding a bridging visa; in light of that non-appearance and evidence, the Court was satisfied that the appeal should be dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Hearing of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for failure of the appellant to attend the hearing of the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['failure to Attend Hearing' 'dismissal of Appeal' 'bridging Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Hearing of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the appeal should be dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) for the appellant's failure to attend the hearing of the appeal."]
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not appear when the appeal was called, and the Minister's movement records indicated that he had departed Australia on 9 September 2009 while holding a bridging visa; in light of that non-appearance and evidence, the Court was satisfied that the appeal should be dismissed under s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for failure of the appellant to attend the hearing of the appeal.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the appeal be dismissed for the failure of the appellant to attend the hearing of the appeal.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment