SZKTS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 1852
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's judicial review application was well out of time under s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), the Federal Magistrates Court had no jurisdiction, no comprehensible ground of review was shown, and the applicant's substantial unexplained delay meant there was no prospect of useful discretionary relief.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrates Court Decision Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'judicial Review' 'time Limits' 'leave to Appeal' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrates Court Decision Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrates Court decision dismissing the judicial review application as incompetent because it was out of time under s 477(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' "Whether the applicant's delay and asserted grounds of review justified any useful relief."]
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's judicial review application was well out of time under s 477 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), the Federal Magistrates Court had no jurisdiction, no comprehensible ground of review was shown, and the applicant's substantial unexplained delay meant there was no prospect of useful discretionary relief.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the first respondent's costs assessed in the sum of $2,000."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment